Commentary for Bava Kamma 139:7
אמר אמימר אי תפס לא מפקינן מיניה רב אשי אמר כיון דכתביה ליה כל דמתעני מן דינא קבילית עלי שליח שויה
Amemar said: [In any case] where the assignee became possessed of articles belonging to the defendant, we would not take them away from him.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the benefit of the defendant even where the prescribed clause 'to go forth and secure for himself' etc. was not inserted in the instrument of assignment. According, however, to Gaonic interpretation it means that the assignee may retain the articles against the assignor (v. Rashi). ');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 139:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.